LIP don't stand a change against falsified e bundles
Despite the Judge being advised that the e bundle had been tampered with and evidence (surveys) changed, coupled with the fact that I, as claimant, had never seen the e bundle nor had a copy in the actual Hearing, she went ahead with the case. I was a LIP and every point I raised throwing more and more doubt on the Defendant's evidence, the Judge (Manners) assisted them in getting out of the corner. The Defendant had spent £7500 in costs using a Barrister at a previous hearing to stop a Third Survey, even quoting case law. The surveyor who was for the Defence was a friend of theirs who had come out during lockdown. There were amended surveyors from him and yet the judge did nothing. Oh she did. In a small claim court, where I had a survey showing trespass, she dismissed the case and made me pay their costs of £20,000 without any explanation to me and when I appealed on the spot, she denied any right to appeal. Justice is to available to the innocent at this court.