Datasport Review

I can follow the words of Lu Nei: Very high transaction fees, which I find a joke. Other providers (timing companies with a simpler registration procedure) are significantly cheaper. Here, the athletes, because they rely on just this one sign-up procedure, once again pulled a lot of money out of his pocket. I appreciate it, if the timekeeping and registration companies get even more competitors and the sports organizers have the courage to change such "expensive" companies.

Very reliable timing and interesting reports about endurance sports.

Great thing but unfortunately I find the redesign of the homepage very bad. Before, it was much clearer to look for past and future events.

Is getting old, because some address parts can not edit, who wants to "complete his run" should, if possible, ask the organizer for a tender!

We drive our development both on analytical as on event adaptation side forward. We leverage state of the art technology trough IoT and empowered by AI capabilities with our down to earth process experience from over 9000 managed events in the last 30 years. What we develop goes quickly to market with 2.5 million current Datasport users and 400 serviced events.

Transaction fees are non-transparent and far too high.

there are additional transaction and security costs - unappealing, unsportsmanlike, customer-oriented and up-to-date?

Their website is a real disaster, no way to log in. The smartphone app is worse.