Completely and utterly bias in her recommendation....

Completely and utterly bias in her recommendation. She made extremely damaging and absolutely inaccurate remarks that defamed the character of a father wanting time with his child. When asked to explain by multiple people, including a court official, she refused. She have no justification for her assessment. She merely stated, it s not legally binding, insinuating that her court ordered investigation didn t hold much weight. However, her harsh, biased, inappropriate, false, and unjustified words have proven quite detrimental in this case. Her review further separated a father and child. Furthermore, she made it clear that her priority was to line her pockets. She was deceptive and misleading in her conversations. She was pleasant and seemingly impartial which gave no indication of the horrid and despicable report that soon followed. She was pleasant and misleading as she demanded payment before releasing a report that I m certain she knew was false.