Reviews 14
Filters:
Rating
Language
Sort:
Most recent

More

Master to avoid / teaching team slammed

Master to avoid / teaching team slammed

Former student in Master Design Global Research and Innovation (product design specialization). I validated my year of M1 but I did not wish to continue this school because:

The price, I paid + 7,500 a year for:

-A deplorable organization.
- an educational team in M1 to pick it up. -not interesting subjects that do not answer any problem of the current market, so a little irrelevant book when looking for an internship (6 months abroad in M1). J
-Teachers with a way of thinking worthy of the Arts and Craft movement (I'm talking about the old people especially the teachers of architecture), not to the tastes of new technologies.
-Meetings with teachers (1-2 times a week) boiling down to presenting a project telling us "this is changing" in 10 min.
-No coordination within the teaching team ( ) and it cuts the word and its groan on the other SUPER
- subjects who have neither tail nor head; it was necessary that all the specialties of the master (products, spaces, graphics) could work on it in a group ... that gave rise to utopian subjects.
-a workshop both supplied with equipment and a student fridge at the end of the month.
- workshops anything but relevant. It seemed as if they had to fill their lack of inspiration with weeks of playing with a nailer and dices of fir trees.
-the secretary in charge of admissions and internships who announces appointment days with professionals (aim to help students sell and find an internship) then who leaves at the beginning of the year. The project falls apart. A new person takes the torch but organizes nothing behind. Not even able to give me addresses of elders to interact with them and find an internship. After 6 meetings to tell me where I am, dare to pull out a towel with 4 written agency addresses ... half of which are communication agencies.
-student life I don't even talk about it, it's also bad
-lots rotten also except for the administration part (there was not even a fucking window in our room)

I surely forget it, but it was an interesting year in terms of social ties and experiences that I had with my classmates. I mainly pay to learn to play table football, manage my projects alone on my side and organize myself. Otherwise nothing more.

All that to say that this school is NOT even worth a tenth of what it claims to be. Manaa and bts must surely be good but the Masters are void.

I also learn a good lesson about life's failures and how to bounce back to find what we really like to do.

My farewell to this shitty school and my success to those who will leave it

A known school and yet:

A known school and yet:
-No pedagogy
-Lack of organization.
-Duties returned without explanation and / or correction.
-Things often said orally by the management team but which are ultimately not put into practice !!

In short, good notoriety but which hides a lack of commitment! A money factory no more no less ...

A school whose photo section is just bad. Photo st...

A school whose photo section is just bad. Photo studios are not suitable, no photo printer available to students (so extra costs outside to make photos requested). Most teachers are bad and give an impression of failed artists looking to round off their end of the month by "giving courses"

Ecole de Condé Paris

Ecole de Condé Paris

3.1