D

Diego Ballerini

3 years ago

The machines have not paid for as long as they did...

The machines have not paid for as long as they did.

I have the following theory:
I started going to the casino a year and a half ago, the machines cost 5/10/25 cvs ...

Making a calculation with random numbers ... Suppose the casino collection is not exactly the same but let's say something else, something less, is similar every month ...

On that assumption, let's say, randomly, that a year ago the casino raised 100 million, with that collection it pays salaries, taxes, supplies, maintenance, prizes, etc ...

Today, a year and a half later, the machines continue to cost the same 5/10/25 cvs, for example, the machine I play the minimum is $ 7.50 today as it was a year and a half ago.

If the machines cost the same and the influx of people is the same, we understand that today a year and a half later the collection should be the same ... as we said, 100 million.

Now with 60% inflation (minimum) in this last year and a half, where salaries, supplies, taxes and all casino expenses grew to that extent, if we adjust the collection to inflation, it is like today the casino will raise 40 million and not 100. Or put another way, it is paying salaries, taxes ... etc, etc. 60% more expensive while raising the same as a year and a half ago.

Now I ask: How do you think the casino survives with this equation? There are only two options:

1- Having increased the value of machines based on inflation
2- Increase collection by making machines pay less

The machines did not increase in the last year and a half ... draw your own conclusions.

Comments:

No comments