I performed an Immunological visit with Dr. Marco ...

I performed an Immunological visit with Dr. Marco Folci at Humanitas.
I had brought along a lot of material to be viewed, a rather detailed clinical history.
At the end of the visit it was agreed to carry out further examinations and then to evaluate the situation.
Carried out the same, I proceeded to send to the doctor by e-mail the results of the new exams, the examinations examined during the visit and other reports that maybe could be useful.
I was told that everything was fine.
I expressed some perplexities about it and I proceeded to ask for clarifications, which I had no answer for more than two weeks.
Only at my request, I was later replied that my doubts were unfounded.
I then turned to another professional bringing all the documentation already viewed by Folci, who has prescribed me for in-depth examinations being convinced it was not all right.
In the meantime, contact Humanitas (at the public relations office) to ask for the work of his doctor, in the face of the different opinion of the doctor I asked subsequently.
The answer comes after some time and basically inform me to believe that the work of Folci has been adequate.
Now I have in my hands the results prescribed by the doctor to whom I have addressed later in which the presence of "lymph nodes with immunoreactive appearance" is attested in the neck area.
Then summarizing Dr. Folci has defined "all right" a condition of immune stress with lymph nodes of immunoreactive appearance, and Humanitas, as requested by me, considered his work adequate and correct.
This is what, in my case, I am still under investigation in order to identify causes and therapies, unfortunately having lost precious time thanks to the inadequate indications received in Humanitas.
But this experience may perhaps be useful to others, who at least will be informed of what could happen by turning to doctors who work at Humanitas.