Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

Your response gives the impression that you have not carefully read my previous comment and that you twist and manipulate the arguments to arrange them as you wish.

First question: on the basis of my anonymity, how can you establish that I do not write the payment checks for my expenses? Unfortunately for you, your "bad pay" argument (which I already pointed out in my previous post) can not apply to me. As for me, my charges are up to date ... Because yes, we can pay his charges in due form and be dissatisfied with his trustee ... Beyond that, my opinion was mostly on the scale of MA co-ownership ( because yes, surprisingly, the co-owners communicate with each other).

I criticize you for your lack of listening, diplomacy, transparency, and responsiveness at all levels. I do not believe to have affirmed that "I waited wisely your contentious raises" ... On the contrary! I reproach you for "rarely answering emails, not at all on the phone and even less the letters recommended" of your co-owners (and this for the disputes of the co-ownership as the problems of management of the daily).

I also reproach you for charging your contentious raises whatever happens and whatever the co-owner in front of you and the status of his file ... I do not think I'm wrong in saying that the invoice billed automatic seems to me somewhat misplaced and brutal under certain conditions and in certain contexts ... It is normal to make litigation but not in this way ... even more when you turn a deaf ear with your co-owners.

In other words, I wanted to establish a general observation within my co-ownership which does not seem to be the only one to suffer from the situation in view of previous opinions published on this page ... In order to really solve the problems and to "Find a solution", so it would be better if you respond to registered letters, emails or phone calls from co-owners rather than negative reviews on Google.

Finally, if my opinion does not suit you, I am sure that it may interest other Internet users ... So I do not believe that this is a waste of time that is to the detriment of the payment of my charges (all the same reasoning very recurrent in your office when the returns to you are negative).

I invite you to re-read carefully my first opinion and therefore I leave you the same to meditate on the subject.

Best regards

The same co-owner dissatisfied

PS: I invoke my right of reply. Since Google does not allow me to reply to your comment about me, you will understand that I adapt and that I allow myself to use another email address ...