Very poor regulator not there to deal with consumers complaints only to stick up for all the companies which it suppose to regulate but because they get funded by the same companies it should regulate it s totally pointless body and should be dismantled as it doesn t have any benefits to consumers
Start collecting reviews today
Claim your business to immediately update business information, respond to reviews, and more!
Compared to regulators in more developed countries in the EU this one outside the EU is a very poor performer.
Lots of hype on BBC Moneybox bigging up the uk telecoms providers but most of this information is misleading or blatant lies. This is particularly the case with broadband.
The UK is a knuckle dragger compared to many countries when it comes to infrastructure progress.
Just what is the building owner thinking re security, with new front desk there are now 2 security checks and lanyards - its been very safe for a decade with just one
Ofcom is UK's independent regulator and competition authority for the communications industries.
Ofcom regulates the TV and radio broadcasters, telecommunication network operators for fixed and mobile services, postal services, and issues licences for use of radio waves (more properly: radio frequency spectrum).
Ofcom has a statutory duty to take into account in its decisions the interests of listeners, viewers, consumers and generally the citizens of UK. It monitors and publishes reports on the level of customer satisfaction with the services provided by the industry and may consider complaints against the regulated companies (such as complaints about inappropriate content of TV or radio programmes).
Ofcom state on their website that their duties are: "to further the interests of citizens and of consumers. Meeting these two duties is at the heart of everything we do."
Ofcom operates under the Communications Act 2003 and is accountable to the UK Parliament. It is funded from fees paid by the broadcasting and telecommunications industry and may receive grant-in-aid from the Government.
Ofcom informs the Parliament on the more technical matters in their legislation-making process in the area of radio and telecommunications and postal services. Ofcom also represents the interests of UK in international organisations, such as ITU (International Telecommunications Union), CEPT (a European organisation), etc. It also is responsible for the harmonisation and compliance of UK regulations with those of EU in its area of competence.
(Note: It's interesting that a UK regulatory body has an entry in Google+ as if it were a company or a service provider, and that Google+ users are asked to review Ofcom and comment on their experience and satisfaction with its services. On the other hand, this undoubtedly is in the interests of the democratic process, since indeed Ofcom have a duty of service to the public as a government approved regulator. With my brief introduction to Ofcom I wanted to provide information to non-experts about this Google+ entry.)
Every time I deal with Ofcom especially the Amateur Radio aspects....usually for NOVs ..Notice of Variation ...for Special Event Call Signs ....They are ALWAYS..." HAPPY2HELP " ....a rare thing these days amongst large organisations Fay ..Lynsey and Michael recently .....THANK YOU I must not forget Winnie on switchboard Tom g0nsy ( RSGB RM9 )
mobile numbers beginning with 07 have always been ordinary private or business numbers at basic charge rate. Why then did Ofcom allow mobile numbers beginning 070 to be high charge or money making numbers. They have become a common focus of fraud on trading sites freecycle etc. This is an example of a so called regulator failing to preform the most basic of protection, or did someone get a nice kickback payment for allowing this, how much money have 070 made for their operators