What stands out is the balance between ease of use and robust security. The ability to point a form at the endpoint and get email validation, bot detection, and rate limiting without writing backend code is a significant advantage. I particularly appreciate that submissions land in a Postgres database that you own, with the option to export via API. The fact that raw IPs are never stored, only salted hashes, adds a layer of privacy that is often overlooked. While the setup is straightforward, having control over the security modes allows for fine-tuning protection without redeploying. It seems like a reliable choice for maintaining form integrity.
What reviewers say about Fieldpost
What does Fieldpost do?
Fieldpost provides a form backend service that processes web form submissions through an API endpoint, with built-in email validation, bot detection, rate limiting, spam filtering, and protection against injection-based attacks, and it works without requiring backend code from the user.
What are the most common complaints about Fieldpost?
The reviews on file are mostly positive, so common complaints are not clearly documented; only one review gave a middling 3-star rating, and even that reviewer expressed enthusiasm rather than specific grievances.
Post your question publicly — other visitors, and whoever manages this page, can answer. It will be visible on this page.
Want to hear about this company again? Follow it and we’ll email you when a new review appears.
Based on reviews on this page. Verify anything important with the company directly.
The integration process is remarkably straightforward, requiring only a single endpoint and an access key. I appreciate that the optional embed script is under one kilobyte, ensuring my Lighthouse scores remain unaffected while still providing essential AJAX capabilities. It truly feels like a lightweight solution that delivers significant value without cluttering the codebase or slowing down the user experience.
From the information available, Fieldpost presents a compelling case for developers looking to secure their forms without managing a backend. The promise of zero backend code and the inclusion of features like rate limiting and shield filtering for SQL injection and XSS are impressive technical achievements. However, one must consider that while the free tier is included, the specifics of the security rules and how they interact with different frameworks like Next.js or Webflow might require some initial experimentation. The documentation suggests that privacy is handled via salted hashes rather than storing raw IPs, which is a positive note. Yet, for a seamless experience, understanding the exact configuration required for each security mode is essential before full deployment.
The range of security options is impressive. It is reassuring that CAPTCHA solutions like Turnstile and reCAPTCHA are included on every plan rather than being paywalled features.
Questions & Answers
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Sign in to post
Your text is saved — you'll come right back to post.
Don't have an account? Create one
News & Press
No news yet. This is where the business shares its own updates and press.
Photos
No photos yet. Photos shared by reviewers will show up here.
About Fieldpost
Fieldpost provides a form backend service that processes web form submissions through an API endpoint. The platform includes built-in email validation, bot detection, rate limiting, spam filtering, and protection against injection-based attacks, designed to work without requiring backend code from the user. It supports integration with various frameworks and static site builders, including plain HTML, Next.js, React, Vue, Svelte, Astro, Webflow, and Framer. Submissions are stored in a Postgres database, and the service offers optional CAPTCHA support as well as compatibility with Supabase for data management.
- Website
- fieldpost.dev
- [email protected]
- Categories
- Computer software, Internet, Computer & network security