For all those people who reflect on other accidents, the uranium that Argentina uses is natural and not intoxicating like the others ... on the other hand, in Japan it is used enriched altered bone
I totally disagree on this type of energy, no matter how much they say it is clean energy, it leaves radioactive waste with no precedents that don't know how to get rid of them. In addition to the catastrophe that would be an accident in one of these plants. There are other safe and clean ways to generate energy.
I don't know how there are people afraid of it exploding
Anyway, people who only know about radiation learned it from the Simpsons
nuclear accidents can be counted on the fingers of the hand
I went fishing in a stream that is in the area and I found this. We ate it with my family and now we can see through the walls. Copado.
Really little we know of our achievements as a country so many people knew ... so much human power
It was one of the first to put Argentina in the nuclear energy race for Civil use, thus creating energy to feed the provinces
It is a true work of the total madness of rulers without conscience. We are really all fried in case something happens in some powerful reactors. A shame who chose his LOCATION. The most populated city in Argentina is less than 100 km away from mortal danger !!
Something I want to say is that plant plants have a useful life time so much 1 would have to be (be) serated because it has reached the useful life time.
A Seeing so many ways to get sustainable energy just a reactor, but well something is something
Nice place, they respect the environment. The one he doesn't like is because he is afraid of what happened at CHERNOBYL, but they don't even know why the reactor exploded
I recommend the visit. We went as a school ride lesson, all delighted, students and teachers. Impeccable the guide and the treatment in general that we receive from the staff of the Central. We will be back
I would love to meet the plant in person, but I have related to it since I go to a technical school, and I can say that like its sister and the central reservoir, they are impeccable.
As for the people who complain about radiation from the U 235 already used, I inform them that it is stored in concrete basins, so that if this were not done, it would be a total catastrophe, and from its operation we would be drinking water radioactive (that is, measures have been taken, the personnel who handle this were not born yesterday).
Transversely, they speak of an explosion, and let me explain why it has not exploded before and it will not explode in the future; During the uranium fission process, there is a chain release of neutrons that will fission more U 235 atoms, and for this the control rods arrive, which absorb a large amount of neutrons through boron, thus allowing the " appeasement "of the process, what happened in other plants was due to human errors, as happened in Fukushima, where a sudden tsunami devastated the plant, and the workers could not turn it off.
My message is that before putting a star and speaking from an ignorant position, investigate, and remove doubts.
They would have to take it out. Very polluting and risky for nearby cities. A danger
I like nuclear energy but it's a bit dangerous but it's the best thing in our country
Let's see, it didn't go, but I wanted to clarify something, IT IS NOT DANGEROUS OR CONTAMINANT, when the quarantine is over I want to go :)
What happened with the power cut, is everything okay ?.
The place is very big but I give it those stars because when I went (without a pandemic) they did not let us pass.
I will always remember when I was guarding this central
The creation of electricity through nuclear power plants allows to reduce the amount of energy generated from fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, this decrease in the use of fossil fuels helps to lower emissions of polluting gases, such as CO2. The smoke that comes out of the chimneys of nuclear power plants, although it seems very polluting, is water vapor.
Currently, more fossil fuels are used than are produced, so these resources will be depleted or the price would rise so much that they would not be accessible to the majority of the population. Reducing the consumption of coal and oil helps reduce the global warming problem of the planet's climate change. By reducing the consumption of fossil fuels, the quality of the air we breathe would also improve, which would imply a decrease in diseases and quality of life.
Another advantage is in the small amount of fuel required, since with a small amount of fuel (uranium) large amounts of energy are obtained. This means saving on raw materials but also on transportation, extraction and handling of nuclear fuel. The cost of nuclear fuel (uranium) is 20% of the cost of the energy generated.
The production of electrical energy is continuous. A nuclear power plant is operating 90% of the hours of the year. Nuclear energy does not depend on natural or climatic aspects, unlike some renewable energies, such as solar energy or wind energy, in which the hours of sun or wind do not always coincide with the hours of highest energy demand .
I would like to know how many m2 has atucha 1. is for a university tp
Instead of using the funds for clean energy, we use it to commit suicide slowly ...
Let's look at the documentary Fukushima so as not to forget. the most inhabited city in this country is less than 100km from a nuclear power plant ...
don't fuck with that fukushima thing, this is art: v
Nuclear energy pollutes and leaves waste. And the worst, near a nature reserve. A complete disregard for life.
petrotecnia.com.ar