Chambers and Office of Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General for India. Reviews

The only problematic thing about this is they take tooooooo many unnecessary holidays even when nation is slowing down because of extremely long process for justice. Ironically the only system should work day and night to clear millons of pending cases but they take maximum holidays.

The mess of politics, promotion seemed insecure, we generals

4 of the most senior judges after the CJI declared that the administration of the supreme court is not in order and that the CJI is responsible. I would give 0 stars if I could.

The walls are crumbling no matter how good the architecture looks...

Supreme court main vakil bout achche hai jo subki madhat kerna janthey

The interior was historical and building construction came from British technology. Still it is the best court in India's court office constructions.

Made worst decision by conducting NEET this year Violation of natural rights of students who dont know anything about competitive exam

The apex court of republic of india. According to the law and to be very precise according to the constitution of India; Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial institution of the country. Initially instituted for looking into the constitutional issues; even enjoys supreme authority over all the High Courts/ Subordinate courts under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Please note :
It has come to my notice that some people inspite of not being of Indian origin have mocked Supreme Court by sayings/calling it a joke.
I condemn them by saying that joking about Supreme Court of India in India is not a joke.. so kindly restrain yourself and respect our judicial institutions. Or be ready to face the legal consequences.

S.c
Is beat decion in india

The Supreme Court of India is facing its worst crisis of credibility since the Emergency. With an occasional exception, the quality of the court s reasoning, the inconstancy of its judgment, the abdication of its constitutional role in some cases, and its overreach in others, are already denting its authority. But the institutional crisis that the Supreme Court has now created for itself will puncture more holes in the authority that it so valiantly tried to exert. It will also create the conditions under which it will be easier to legitimise diluting judicial independence.

The current crisis was occasioned by an order passed by Justice J Chelameswar to constitute a five-judge bench in a petition filed by CJAR that demanded that a SIT be constituted to look into an alleged corruption scandal pertaining to a case involving a medical college. There are two issues: Can the chief justice be part of the hearing, since the scandal allegedly implicates a judgment the CJI wrote, even though he has not been named in the FIR? Second, could a constitution bench be constituted bypassing the chief justice in violation of the current procedure through which such benches are constituted? This is not the place to recount the ugly sequence of events that transpired. But consider the different ways in which the judiciary has now rendered itself vulnerable.

First, there is the vulnerability that arises from the CBI itself. There are issues of corruption in the courts. The judiciary has failed to find a mechanism to deal with allegations of corruption within its ranks. Every justice in the court needs to be above suspicion. But a lot of care needs to be exercised so that the anti-corruption measures taken do not undermine the independence of the judiciary. This is not a very popular thing to say, but we should also consider the possibility that the threat of being investigated by the CBI, or speculative naming (or suggestion in a CBI report), can itself also be an instrument of seeking recusals or undermining the independence of judges, as is sometimes done with other government officials. This subtle institutional challenge to the judiciary is not outside of the realm of possibility. More than the conduct of Justices Misra and Chelameswar, the judiciary will have to think of how it will deal with instances where the Chief Justice of India or other justices becomes hostage to possible CBI innuendo.

The Hon'ble Apex court. High security zone in New Delhi

Why won't you communicate hard copy/desplay the important service matters judgement's copies to the concerned departments.

To be very tough against Corruption & Crime ! Jai Hind

partialy influenced by GOI....And actualy its best example of "" Tarikh pe tarikh tarikh pe tarikh "" .....mostly in religious and big political issues....I personaly hate this lazy elephant kind of judiciary.........

#salute
Supreme Court of India came into existence on 26th January, 1950 and is located on Tilak Marg, New Delhi. On the 28th of January, 1950, two days after India became a Sovereign Democratic Republic, the Supreme Court came into being. The inauguration took place in the Chamber of Princes in the Parliament building which also housed India's Parliament, consisting of the Council of States and the House of the People. It was here, in this Chamber of Princes, that the Federal Court of India had sat for 12 years between 1937 and 1950. This was to be the home of the Supreme Court for years that were to follow until the Supreme Court acquired its own present premises.
The inaugural proceedings were simple but impressive.
Taking care to ensure that the Rules of the Supreme Court were published and the names of all the Advocates and agents of the Federal Court were brought on the rolls of the Supreme Court, the inaugural proceedings were over and put under part of the record of the Supreme Court.
After its inauguration on January 28, 1950, the Supreme Court commenced its sittings in a part of the Parliament House. The Court moved into the present building in 1958. The building is shaped to project the image of scales of justice. The Central Wing of the building is the Centre Beam of the Scales. In 1979, two New Wings - the East Wing and the West Wing - were added to the complex. In all there are 15 Court Rooms in the various wings of the building. The Chief Justice's Court is the largest of the Courts located in the Centre of the Central Wing.
The original Constitution of 1950 envisaged a Supreme Court with a Chief Justice and 7 puisne Judges - leaving it to Parliament to increase this number. In the early years, all the Judges of the Supreme Court sat together to hear the cases presented before them.
We Supreme Court Judges retire upon attaining the age of 65 years. In order to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court, a person must be a citizen of India and must have been, for atleast five years, a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession, or an Advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession for at least 10 years or he must be, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist. Provisions exist for the appointment of a Judge of a High Court as an Ad-hoc Judge of the Supreme Court and for retired Judges of the Supreme Court or High Courts to sit and act as Judges of that Court.
The Constitution seeks to ensure the independence of Supreme Court Judges in various ways. A Judge of the Supreme Court cannot be removed from office except by an order of the President passed after an address in each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of members present and voting, and presented to the President in the same Session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity. A person who has been a Judge of the Supreme Court is debarred from practising in any court of law or before any other authority in India.
The proceedings of the Supreme Court are conducted in English only. Supreme Court Rules, 1966 are framed under Article 145 of the Constitution to regulate the practice and procedure of the Supreme Court.

I many and many more are respodents of Civil Appeal 632/2008. The case is pending in SC since 2005. last on 23.4.2015 Hon'ble court order in civil appeal was ' Hearing concluded , Judgement reserved'. Till now no judgement has come. 10 years gone.

Believe in indian judiciary!! They are really very fair!! I got my case s decision today from Honourable Justice Mr. A K Goel and Honourable Justice Mr U U Lalit. A huge respect. They have made my belief even more stronger in judicial system in India.