I met Dr John Kasinathan in 2013, he is/was a Conj...

I met Dr John Kasinathan in 2013, he is/was a Conjoint Lecturer at UNSW and I am afaid to say but he could not find domestic abuse of a man because Dr John Kasinathan makes sure to take into account 3rd and 4th hand information rather then watching a videos of 'domestic abuse', 'night after home invasion 1', 'gay-bashing', 'home invasion 2' or actually accepting any verbal report of the domestic abuse I was forced to live with at that very low point in my life (anytime after 2002 where my right to have even the most basic of things like a shower would result in myself being subjected to physical assault and mental abuse by family members. This delusional Dr has even gone as far to comment upon my appearance even though I had never met him in 2002. According to this Dr my appearance to him in 2002 was a result of myself not taking care of my hair, hygiene, etc and not any domestic abuse of which he made sure to never use those words in his report).

This Dr is willing to engage in a form of fee-sharing where he accepts incomplete and incorrect information as fact and he will make sure to not enquire as to its validity before returning a finding that was requested by a peer whom he could not refuse as repercussions may of been great (400k research grant was awarded after the 'gay bashing' video became 'harassment' according the files that Dr John Kasinathan used as fact).

This uni shows one public face but behind the side-show they have fellows running around under the request of old men that originated from countries where fixing the unwilling to arranged/forced marriages, fixing lgbtqi's and fixing criminals perhaps within a CAST society with chemical medications only was widely accepted. PS: if B/W photos from periods of time where abuse I describe above adorn the walls of persons whom request reports from this Dr John Kasinathan then you are dealing and speaking with what can be best termed as a fraud or at the very least a danger to anyone who is unfortunate enough to be 'reviewed by his delusion that is constructed from text only information that is upon record which was entered by persons whom were training to gain qualification and of which for some reason this status of training isnt noted in the file - however this doesnt matter to the Dr and he will not double check information to a suitable standard before he makes only a diagnosis (forget about prognosis as his intent is to harm)'. ECG's of abnormal result will be neglected along with other serious health conditions as according to the file which is incorrect - im 100% fit and healthy (pity about that lung ACT Health damaged, anyone know what that is worth?)

According to another from the ANU this Dr John Kasinathan is a Internet Expert on everything (SEO, connectivity, analitics, and everything else on IT that you could ever think about - so much an expert his time spent being a Dr at medicine is moonlighting his considerable knowledge base and life experience of a classroom between field trips to fix the 'undesired' by generating literary works of fiction).

This man will lie - he will ask questions and pretend he is sorry but isnt at all - and eye contact with him when he lies is very difficult. He told me he is only filling out the paper work he had there with him on the one ocasion but really he is making a multi-page report based upon false information supplied by others whom were not trained on how to record the correct information or record their level of education. According to my file he reviewed I have been convicted of two criminal offences - these two criminal offences of which I have never seen a court in regards to the claims or even a police officer however that information was used by him to incite others to become aggressive towards myself and causing great amount of distress and possibly effecting my future health needs.