These ... (I do not know how to qualify them, to r...

These ... (I do not know how to qualify them, to remain correct) stole 400 : Interventions to be charged to the co-owners and not to the tenants, billing fictitious interventions after inventory of places of exit, no justification. Warning! If you can not be behind their backs at any time, you'll be fooled! I have all the elements to seize justice, except 2: time, and closeness! As I'm not there to put the misery they deserve, for want of anything better, I want to add my grain of vitriol to the long list of negative opinions. If you are parents of students, and you are geographically distant, DO NOT ALWAYS SEE THEM. In addition to being dishonest (*), they are incompetent, responsiveness is zero, politeness and respect of their non-existent interlocutors. In short, like the stains that their cleaning subcontractor takes months and months to remove (Because the agency did not do its job) in the common areas. My satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 5: rigorously 0 (ZERO) A star is just technical to publish PTDR !. Never seen that in more than 35 years of agency attendance.
(*) dishonesty seems to have long been their favorite sport to read articles like the one in the following link:
http://www.lyon-info.fr/?Des-locataires-recuperent-421-000