Niehland Reil

Review of Klantenvertellen

I would like to write a review about a company wit...

I would like to write a review about a company with which I have wonderful experiences and ended up on this site. I have been writing reviews for a while now and the strength of a good review portal is that both good and bad experiences can be shared so that a customer has at least some idea with who or what he has 'to do' with before doing business.
The smart customer knows which reviews matter and which ones you can skip. Of course, you rarely come across a truly nuanced story about a company on the internet and that in itself is not surprising. Most people are of course not nuanced; people with 300 reviews in their name from 2 glaring lines, envy, eg having a bad experience with a company and not being able to tell it in a controlled and civilized way and so on. Still, you have to start somewhere in your assessment whether a site is worth it to 'risk' a review or not, you want to contribute to a better society yourself, and not write 'for nothing', at least many among us then ... Writing a good review is not that easy and whether it is a 1 or 5 star review does not matter. My working method is usually that I first just take a brief look at the figure and then read a number of reviews myself. You often quickly 'read' from the use of language where you ended up, and any responses from an owner say a lot. On this site I notice two things: firstly that the figure is lousy low ... actually only 'Ziggo' scores even worse;), and secondly that the owner does not actually go into the 'arguments' ... that are given in the reviews. Although that owner may of course be tired of all the injustice that happened to him, it doesn't seem to be stupid, so I am left with the feeling after going through 70 reviews that there is at least the appearance of financial entanglement, I sincerely hope that this is not the case, but if it does, Google reviews here 'does' exactly the work for which it is intended. I advise the owner of the company to be completely open about his / her motivations for placing certain reviews or not. Unfortunately, there is not always a grain of truth in a smear against a person or company, that such a smear sometimes occurs spontaneously is simply dictated by our economic model and the limitations we dare / can impose on ourselves. I can therefore imagine that in order to give a serious, honest impression of a company you want to remove 'the bad apples', but there is an unprecedented field of tension. Violating the 'truth' by interfering with statistics is undeniably a great danger.