Stefan Ojog Review of evoMAG.ro
Hello! I am the manager of a company in Bac u with...
Hello! I am the manager of a company in Bac u with over 15 employees. In order to create all the necessary comforts and make the staff not always carry the phone with them, I decided to buy two Xiaomi Mi Band 5 bracelets (order 1571003). Nowhere in the product description or in its specification did it appear anywhere that it is not the global version, but the Chinese one. After the package arrived, I opened one of the bracelets very carefully to keep the packaging, but also the foils in which it came intact so that there would be no discussions on a possible return. After 2 minutes of use I was surprised to see that this is the Chinese version of the bracelet, which did not suit me, I was not notified before this. I didn't even get close to the other bracelet in the package, knowing that it is in the same stage of non-compliance. I immediately called the courier and sent the package the same day at my expense back to them and I sent them an email with all the details and the return form completed, so that everything would be as fast and on time. A few days later, a gentleman with the initials D.P. who is supposed to deal with the Return to them informed me that the return cannot be accepted due to the fact that the products were bought by a legal entity, and I do not meet a condition:
- minimum 3 completed orders (Corporate account) prior to the one for which you want to return with a minimum value. 10,000 lei;
This condition seems completely absurd and at the same time funny. It's the kind of condition that he expressly puts on you so that you can't fulfill it. I tried via email (not the other way around, but no one answered the phone, although I stayed on the waiting line for several days in a row for more than 30 minutes) to explain to the gentleman what he was doing. returns that it is not correct at all and that there could have been boulders in the package and that if I had managed to pay them, I still could not return that I did not meet the condition with the 3 orders of at least 10,000 lei. In addition, I also mentioned that on the site they did not specify anything related to the fact that the version they sold is not the global one, but is the cheapest, Chinese. He didn't seem to have read the emails from me in full, but just replied that: We are sorry, but you don't meet all the return conditions, after which he gave me that condition for 10,000 lei. I kept insisting, and then he said that he could make an "exception" for me and give me 80% of the value of the product. All this time the package had arrived at their headquarters. It seemed to me a bargain of bad taste and meaningless (why accept to receive 80% of the value of the product, as long as the product was non-compliant and I wanted to return them the same day, they are intact), so I refused -a. I sent them an email explaining that the method and the deception on which they are based do not seem correct to me, to which I was replied with: The package cannot be returned because the product packaging is damaged. I mentioned earlier that when I received the bracelets, I opened with maximum attention only one of the boxes, keeping everything absolutely intact and in its original place, and the other box was untouched). In the meantime, they sent the package back to me, but I refused. Basically, even if the product is non-compliant, EVOMAG wants to charge you a 20% TAX from nowhere to receive your return. Instead of profiting from the turnover and sale of as many products as possible, he prefers to rely on such deceptive practices. If I had ordered a 10,000 lei item that was non-compliant, what would I do? Did I give them 2,000 lei and agree to return only 8,000 to me because this is the bargain they propose to me? I am still waiting for some sincere apologies and the return accepted under normal conditions, as is natural and correct for a company that wants to be one of the biggest and most important in our country.
EDIT: I provided you with all the necessary details and you did not answer! 0 seriousness

Comments: