It is just so much fun to vote on these VAR decisions. I like that I can choose my country and see the results instantly. The site is straightforward and does not get in the way. I recommend it to anyone who wants to see what other fans think about referee calls.
Questions about VAR//VOTE
What is VAR//VOTE?
VAR//VOTE is a platform that lets football supporters vote on VAR decisions and other football debates, featuring a permanent global referendum on whether video refereeing should remain in top-level football. It maintains a public archive of all votes, including past incidents and opinions, accessible through filters and search. Voting is anonymous, requires no name or email, and tracks the voter's country rather than their identity. The site operates in multiple languages including English, Norwegian, French, and Spanish.
What guides does VAR//VOTE provide to explain football rules?
The site offers independent guides explaining football laws and review procedures behind controversial decisions, such as tight offsides and penalties left unchanged after a check. It covers specific topics like the intervention threshold, offside technology, and the difference between a check and an on-field review. These guides use official rules wherever possible to help supporters understand why a decision stands or changes.
How is VAR//VOTE structured and where is it located?
VAR//VOTE is independently operated from Norway and is not affiliated with FIFA, UEFA, IFAB, clubs, leagues, or refereeing bodies. The platform states it is independent of these football authorities while providing its own analysis and voting mechanisms for supporters. This independence allows it to present its own permanent ballot and guide library without direct oversight from governing bodies.
How does the permanent VAR referendum work on the site?
The permanent open ballot on the site asks whether football should keep VAR, with results displayed after users cast their vote. Participation in this referendum is voluntary and is explicitly stated to be not a representative survey of all fans. The archive of past votes includes historical incidents and opinions that users can filter and search through.
What specific review protocols does VAR//VOTE explain in detail?
Users can explore specific review rules such as when VAR can intervene, the clear line for offside, and the handball rule exceptions. The platform also explains the process of how VAR checks and on-field reviews work, including why the referee makes the final call. Guides are available for topics like second yellow cards and the technology behind modern offside tracking systems.
What debates and concerns does VAR//VOTE address regarding VAR?
The site features a debate section that addresses concerns supporters raise about accuracy, consistency, delays, and the clear and obvious error threshold. It also covers the impact of second yellow card changes in the 2026/27 season and how missed cautions remain different under new rules. These topics are presented as part of the ongoing VAR debate exploration.
How does VAR//VOTE help users understand the difference between a check and a review?
The platform provides a guide on how to understand when a check can become a review and why some decisions are not eligible for intervention. It also explains the limits on VAR intervention and links to IFAB and competition guidance with relevant exceptions explained in plain English. This helps users see when a replay shows only part of the story versus the complete explanation.
What specific rule guides are available on VAR//VOTE?
The site allows users to browse guides on specific rules like the intervention threshold, offside timing, and active involvement in offside decisions. It also covers the handball rule, explaining why accidental contact is not always an offence and when a penalty is possible. These guides aim to clarify the rules behind the headlines for supporters.
What makes VAR//VOTE different from other football rule sites?
The platform states that it is independent of clubs and governing bodies, which allows it to present its own permanent ballot without direct affiliation. The site also notes that it is available in multiple languages, including English, Norwegian, French, and Spanish, to reach a wider audience. This multilingual approach supports users from different regions who want to participate in the VAR debate.
What UEFA-related resources does VAR//VOTE provide?
The site offers a guide on UEFA's referee training library, which includes more than 150 scenarios revealing where football draws the line between play on and VAR intervention. It also explains the difference between a check and an on-field review, showing what happens in the video room and when the referee goes to the monitor. These resources help users understand the technical aspects of VAR decisions.
What specific intervention threshold guides does VAR//VOTE offer?
The site includes a guide on the intervention threshold, explaining when VAR can actually intervene and why some decisions are not eligible for intervention. It also covers the clear and obvious error threshold, showing how video evidence does not automatically overturn every disputed decision. These guides help users understand the nuances of VAR intervention rules.
How can I contact VAR//VOTE?
You can reach VAR//VOTE by e-mail at [email protected].
What is the official website of VAR//VOTE?
The official website of VAR//VOTE is varvote.com.
How is VAR//VOTE rated on Trustburn?
On Trustburn, VAR//VOTE has a rating of 4.2 out of 5 based on 5 reviews.
Post your question publicly — other visitors, and whoever manages this page, can answer. It will be visible on this page.
Want to hear about this company again? Follow it and we’ll email you when a new review appears.
Based on reviews, listing data and the company's website. Verify anything important with the company directly.
The public archive is a fantastic feature that allows me to revisit past votes and see how opinions have shifted over time. I appreciate the detailed methodology page, which explains the privacy-preserving voter token and how duplicate votes are limited. It is reassuring to know that the project does not claim to be a scientific poll but rather a voluntary participation tool. The ability to filter by league and team adds a lot of value for fans who want to track specific debates. The site feels well-maintained and professional.
I really like how quick it is to cast a vote. No email needed at all, which is such a nice touch for me.
I am absolutely thrilled with VarVote! The fact that it is independent of clubs and governing bodies makes it feel so much more authentic and trustworthy compared to other platforms. I love how you can vote on individual VAR decisions and then see the public archive. It is fantastic to have a clear picture of what supporters actually think without the noise of paid influencers. The methodology is transparent, and the fact that results are hidden before voting reduces bandwagon effects, which is brilliant. I really appreciate that no email or name is required, making it so easy to jump in. The interface is clean, the articles are interesting, and the global vote is a great way to stay engaged with the sport. It feels like a genuine community effort. I am so happy I found this platform. It brings a fresh perspective to football debates. Keep up the amazing work!
From the information available, the site explains the voting concept clearly. However, the service offering seems to lack specific details on how the global ballot works in practice. For someone considering this company, it would be helpful to see more about the included scope before getting too invested.
Questions & Answers
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Sign in to post
Your text is saved — you'll come right back to post.
Don't have an account? Create one
News & Press
No news yet. This is where the business shares its own updates and press.
Photos
No photos yet. Photos shared by reviewers will show up here.
About VAR//VOTE
VAR//VOTE is a website that lets football supporters vote on VAR (Video Assistant Referee) decisions and other football-related debates. It features a permanent global VAR referendum asking whether video refereeing should remain in top-level football, with results displayed after users cast their vote. The platform keeps a public archive of all votes, including past VAR incidents and football opinions, accessible through filters, search, and pagination. Voting is anonymous, does not require a name or email, and tracks the voter's country rather than identity. The site is available in multiple languages including English, Norwegian, French, and Spanish.
- Website
- varvote.com
- [email protected]
