Based on 5 reviews
Eyes Off is a non-partisan civic campaign focused on automated license plate reader cameras, such as those operated by Flock. It highlights how these cameras collect data on vehicle movements and frames this information as a personal asset. The project encourages visitors to take action to limit their exposure to this surveillance by understanding how the technology works and what data is retained.
The project targets individuals concerned about privacy and the scale of data collection by law enforcement and camera companies. It aims to educate the public on how their movements are tracked and to mobilize neighbors to demand contracts end with camera operators like Flock. The goal is to restore the boundary line between public surveillance and personal privacy rights.
To get started, visitors are encouraged to read the provided resources and reports from outlets like 404 Media and the EFF. The site provides a guide to write to the five major stakeholders who sign the contracts with Flock. Users are asked to get counted and bring two neighbors to collectively demand changes in how data is handled.
Reviewers praise the project for its clear explanation of how Flock cameras operate and the scale of data collection. The site is noted for presenting concrete figures, such as the number of cameras and search logs, to illustrate the scope of surveillance. Users appreciate the non-partisan approach and the actionable steps provided for citizens.
The site references reporting from 404 Media and the EFF to support its claims about Flock's data practices. It cites figures from the National Policing Institute and the Justice Evaluation Journal to illustrate the scale of searches. The project also references a Colorado Sun investigation and a deep-dive brief from the Institute for Justice.
The project features a detailed breakdown of Flock's capabilities, including photographing every car and mapping movements. It highlights that 5,000+ agencies can pull movement data and that Flock keeps data forever while police keep it for 30 days. The site also includes a visual representation of a day on the map to show how data accumulates.
A first-time visitor should know that the project frames vehicle movement data as a personal asset that is sold for 'robot money.' The site explains that Flock deleted a clause in 2026 to allow perpetual data use even after a town cancels the contract. Understanding this shift in Flock's terms is crucial for grasping the project's advocacy goals.
The project supports its claims with citations from the EFF, AP, NPR, and the Institute for Justice. It references a 2025 audit by the Illinois Secretary of State and letters from Sen. Wyden and Rep. Krishnamoorthi to the FTC. The site emphasizes that it only publishes information it can source from these primary sources.
The project is a non-profit organization management entity focused on advocacy rather than commercial services. It does not have a specific pricing model or product catalog but operates on a volunteer or donation basis implied by its civic campaign nature. The site focuses on education and mobilization rather than direct sales or service delivery.
On Trustburn, Eyes Off · Restore the boundary line has a rating of 4.4 out of 5 based on 5 reviews.
AI-generated from reviews on this page. Verify anything important with the company directly.
I was surprised by how much info is out there on the Flock cameras. The site makes it really clear that they are keeping your data forever, not just thirty days like police. It’s wild that they can track you by description now, not just plates. The bit about the drone fleets and the new tech from 2024 shows this is a big deal. It’s good they explain the cost to investors too. Makes you think twice before ignoring the signs on the pole.
The available information serves as a robust resource for anyone wanting to understand the current state of street-level surveillance. The site details how cameras operate, noting that they photograph every passing car and log time and place. It highlights that nearly all scanned drivers are under no suspicion, with roughly ninety-nine percent of the data collected from innocent motorists. The explanation of Flock Nova is particularly useful, showing how plate data fuses with jail records and public data to create a single dossier. The mention of the drone fleets and acoustic sensors adds depth to the understanding of the technology. Knowing that five thousand agencies can access this data helps contextualize the scale. The section on the independent evidence regarding crime reduction is also valuable, pointing out that the evidence is mixed and narrow. This balanced view, combined with the clear explanation of the contract and the ability for residents to write to the people who sign it, makes the platform highly useful for informed decision-making.
The website provides a clear and direct explanation of the surveillance mechanics. It effectively communicates the core issues without unnecessary jargon, making it easy for residents to grasp the situation quickly.
The overview of the Flock network is helpful for understanding the scale of the issue. However, the explanation of specific benefits remains somewhat vague. While the threat is clear, the practical steps for residents feel slightly abstract without more concrete examples of local success stories to illustrate how the boundary line is effectively restored in practice.
From the information available, Eyes Off presents a compelling case against mass surveillance. The breakdown of how Flock operates seems thorough, especially regarding the shift from HOA theft cameras to a broader operating system. It is reassuring to see the data on warrantless searches and the retention policies clearly outlined for residents who want to understand the scope of the technology on their streets.
No news yet. This is where the business shares its own updates and press.
Eyes Off is an advocacy-focused project that highlights the use of automated license plate reader cameras, such as those operated by Flock, and the data they collect on vehicle movements. The site presents information about how the cameras function, how long the data is retained by police and by the camera companies, and the ability of thousands of agencies to search the collected data. It frames vehicle movement data as a personal asset and encourages visitors to take action to limit exposure to this surveillance. The content references reporting from outlets such as 404 Media and the EFF, and cites figures on monthly scans and searches to illustrate the scale of the data collection.