Seller Signal

The scoring system is fantastic for prioritizing leads. Knowing the readiness score helps focus efforts on owners most likely to act. The ability to deep-enrich verified contacts on demand is a game-changer for outreach. The exclusive territory model ensures you are not competing with other advisors for the same leads. This makes the service incredibly valuable for anyone serious about 1031 exchanges.

The service relies on public county records to identify sellers, which ensures transparency. However, the depth of insight depends on the specific market tier and the additional cost of deep-enrichment for verified contact details.

The public county data appears reliable and free, offering a good starting point for market analysis. However, the deep-enrichment feature, which provides verified contacts and household details, is metered and paid. This means that while the initial list is accessible, extracting usable contact information requires additional investment. The scoring system is helpful for prioritizing leads, but the cost structure might be steep for smaller firms. The exclusivity of territories is a strong benefit, ensuring you are not competing for the same leads. The annual pricing discount is appreciated, but the per-market model can become expensive quickly if you cover multiple regions. The data seems accurate, but the pay-per-enrichment model adds a layer of complexity to budgeting. It is a useful tool, but the costs for contact data should be carefully considered before committing to a territory.

From the information available, Seller Signal offers a structured approach to identifying 1031 exchange opportunities by continuously reading public county and listing records. This allows users to spot investment owners who have just put properties on the market, providing a clear timeline for outreach. The platform scores each owner based on embedded gain, sale intent, wealth signals, and investment profiles, creating a ranked call list that prioritizes high-probability leads. This scoring system, ranging from zero to one hundred, helps advisors distinguish between passive listings and active decision-makers facing significant taxable events. The ability to deep-enrich leads on demand for verified mobile, email, LinkedIn, and household data adds a layer of precision without fabricating information. Since the data is pulled from public records, the foundation appears reliable. The tiered territory model, ranging from main street markets to flagship metros, allows firms to secure exclusive access to specific geographic areas. This exclusivity ensures that prospects are not shared with other advisors, potentially increasing conversion rates. The sample reports provide a glimpse into the depth of data, including property types and estimated gains. For advisors managing multiple markets, the ability to watch specific territories and view live counts of measured prospects offers valuable insight into market activity. The process of enriching leads only when necessary helps manage costs while maintaining data quality. Overall, the system seems designed to deliver the signal before the sale, giving advisors a competitive edge in reaching sellers while their window of opportunity remains open.

The pricing model relies on a per-market structure that feels opaque. While annual plans offer two months free, the base rates vary significantly across territories. It remains unclear how deep-enriched contacts are metered or if verified contact data counts toward usage limits without explicit clarification.