Chris Richards
Chris Richards
Chris Richards devil-like, how callous and unskilled of him to use a quotation about St Thomas Moore from someone's work in a skeleton argument of an opponent, that he then breached the code of conduct on legal privilege because they illegally did the work with the Bar Standards Board. So he thinks he can get away with it, yet there is a Fraudulent case pending. But used it to cover up their own true misconduct. What cowards.
Let alone an infringement of someone else's 'literary work' that the case relates to because he lacked his own competence in thinking of anything alone. And his unskilled and unintelligent handling of data in a pending case. You are to CEASE AND DESIST your fabricated post immediately. What idiotic person that they employ, he probably copied everyone else's work when he falsely qualified. He cowardly fails to reference it because he wants to look great in his devil like conduct. PLAGERISM TO ITS HIGHEST WITH INFRINGEMENT ON AN INNOVATION WITHOUT REFERENCING HER NAME TO THE SKELETON ARGUMENT and BREACH OF LEGAL PRIVILEDGE - BUT THEY FEEL THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW.
Those who tampered the skeleton argument and perverted the course of justice before are already liable under criminal activities. Your connection has now been noted. You are to remove this imminently. How disturbing it is to see that this was a family-sensitive piece. They use any means of abuse of power to weaken and bully the Litigant in order to cover up their own misconduct. All methods to control and coerce until she falls, where it is required.
They breached the CPRules over a Litigant In Person who had superseded their knowledge. When she tried to teach them about humanity and they even now steal the proverb that the Litigant depended on. Even injustice towards those who pervert the true evidence. Now pretend their own incompetence of all involved were due to the CPRules and how hypocritical humble they are. They are nothing more than devil-like and now pretend to be so humble with falsities.
If I were so wrong, they would sue me, but it would leave me to put the evidence again of their misconduct, and that's why they don't. This is the truth, and they are to remove this article until they prove otherwise. As that would be the true civil action.
Their greed, control and coercion is shown further by Chris Richards and those who aided/ abetted the post. They are no more than shameless.
They are clearly unintelligent who have never had genuine education who stoop to such low levels.
AND now STEAL my work out of greed, because they lack their own intelligence. They are far from God, but devils in disguise, driven by greed.
You are TO CEASE AND DESIST. I do not doubt, as you bring shame, and I pray your evil backfires.
It is illegal to quote anything from a case document without reference to the person who first wrote it in a piece of work. But the reason they don't reference it is that they aided with the tampered evidence of the Litigant, who stood alone. And their misgivings of dishonesty continue with no shame; they think they can steal anything.
Thinking they are above the law, with no knowledge yet again of the true facts. Facts of Evidence that they tampered with for their benefit, and now they are thinking the evidence does not exist, so let's use her skeleton argument that benefits them AGAIN.
Nothing to do with the CPRules in the way he manipulates their defence, but the truth of how they commit perjury by destroying the evidence from the very first instance. They truly think a Litigant in Person cannot see their misconduct, and why they now try to use her skeleton argument for their false existence.
The Evidence of their misconduct is beyond any reasonable doubt. The reason they don't sue me is that it would expose their plagiarism and criminal association. Whilst they pretend they do not know who I am because it's named Private.
Latest: There were 5 of them plus Exchange Chambers and others. They think I do not know. I requested my original skeleton arguments back. None of them came back to me, except one that was not the original. Why - because they know they have tampered with them. And for other reasons, especially as there maybe a criminal case against them. So they again breach my legal privilege by not returning the documents. That's their abuse of power and the cowards that they are. They will attempt to control you.
