Would this required return approach be better suited for someone who already knows their target annual percentage, or do you help clients figure that out first?

Trustburn Team suggests a starter question on new profiles — the business hasn’t answered yet.

News & Press

No news yet. This is where the business shares its own updates and press.

Photos

No photos yet. Photos shared by reviewers will show up here.

Widgets

Boost your business trust by displaying widget on your website — its a simple way to convert your visitors into customers.

Embed code

<script src="https://trustburn.com/widgets/index.js"></script>
<div class="trustburn-widget" data-trustburn-protocol="https:" data-trustburn-domain="trustburn.com" data-trustburn-widget="score" data-company-path="rulicent-com" data-lang="en"></div>

More widgets

About Rulicent Investments

Every retirement investor has a number the specific annual return their portfolio must achieve to sustain their planned withdrawals over their retirement horizon. We call this the Required Return.

Most advisors never calculate it explicitly. They assign a model portfolio based on a risk tolerance questionnaire, project forward with assumed returns, and call it a plan. The Required Return is implied never tested, never verified.

At Rulicent, the Required Return is the starting point. Every allocation decision, every strategy adjustment, every risk management choice is evaluated against one question: does this give the portfolio a realistic path to delivering the Required Return?

This is not a philosophical difference. It is a structural one and it changes everything about how a portfolio is managed.