The concept of timed public deliberation with device-signed ballots is interesting. The architecture seems sound, with an append-only hash chain ensuring data integrity. However, the available information does not clearly specify the costs associated with the hosted lease or the specific technical requirements for self-hosting the Go API and Postgres components. This lack of detail might require additional communication to fully understand the total cost of ownership.
Haven't used Verifiable institutional voting yet?
Ask Trustburn
Questions about Verifiable institutional voting
What is Verifiable institutional voting?
The platform consists of three components: a voter device application that binds membership and seals ballots, an officer portal for managing membership and decisions, and a backend platform with API and database options. It supports timed public deliberation and device-signed ballots with an append-only public log to ensure record integrity.
How does the platform ensure record integrity?
The system uses an append-only public log where decision artefacts live on an append-only hash chain, ensuring the record cannot be altered after casting.
What is the role of the voter device application?
The voter device application binds membership and seals ballots under Mode B, keeping a tracker and verifying inclusion without publishing how the voter cast their ballot.
What is the role of the officer portal?
The officer portal is designed without a ballot-casting path by design, meaning officers manage membership, packs, decisions, evidence, and tallier support but do not cast votes themselves.
What procedure packs are available for different institutions?
The platform offers procedure packs tailored to different governance contexts, including clubs, boards, unions, councils, and public-interest organizations, with specific packs like club_basic, board_company, and council_chamber.
What features does the backend platform include?
The backend platform provides a Go API, Postgres database, public legitimacy pages, roll commitments, audit packs, and self-host deployment options for organizations that need custom infrastructure.
What is the open-source nature of the platform?
The platform is built as open-source components under the PublicVoting organisation, with branding and packs configured to never weaken cast rules.
How does the platform support high-assurance governance?
The system supports dual control and officer TOTP for boards and companies, ensuring secure resolution processes and privileged role management.
How are roles and processes separated in the system?
The platform allows admins to configure process through branding and packs while maintaining a strict separation where officers run the process and voters cast only from their device.
How can users get started with the platform?
The platform provides a sandbox demo, hosted lease options, and a start here path for users to evaluate the system before committing to a full deployment.
What is the official website of Verifiable institutional voting?
The official website of Verifiable institutional voting is publicvoting.org.
Post your question publicly — other visitors, and whoever manages this page, can answer. It will be visible on this page.
Want to hear about this company again? Follow it and we’ll email you when a new review appears.
Based on reviews, listing data and the company's website. Verify anything important with the company directly.
4 Reviews
The open source voting platform looks really solid for our club needs. I like that ballots are tied to devices and the log is append-only. It feels secure and easy to verify without extra trust layers.
The platform seems well-suited for institutions requiring verifiable outcomes. The emphasis on device-signed ballots and an append-only public log provides a clear audit trail, which is reassuring for compliance. However, from the information available, it is not entirely clear how the initial setup of bind tokens integrates with existing member databases. For someone considering this company, the officer guide appears to be the primary resource for understanding the workflow, so thorough review of those materials is recommended before expecting a seamless deployment of the timed deliberation features.
From the information available, the convenience of the publicvoting.org platform stands out as a significant advantage for institutional users. The distinction between the officer portal and the voter device is clearly articulated, offering a streamlined experience where officers cannot cast votes from the portal. This structural design reduces administrative friction while maintaining a high degree of procedural integrity. The ability to select from procedure packs tailored for different governance cultures, such as clubs, boards, or councils, adds practical value. While the platform appears robust, the specific details regarding the hosted lease terms are not immediately visible, suggesting that interested parties should request further clarification on those commercial aspects before committing.
Questions & Answers
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Sign in to post
Your text is saved — you'll come right back to post.
or with email
Don't have an account? Create one
News & Press
No news yet. This is where the business shares its own updates and press.
Photos
No photos yet. Photos shared by reviewers will show up here.
About Verifiable institutional voting
publicvoting.org is an open-source platform that provides verifiable voting for institutional settings such as clubs, boards, unions, councils, and public-interest organizations. It supports timed public deliberation and device-signed ballots, with an append-only public log to ensure record integrity. The platform consists of three components: a voter device application that binds membership and seals ballots, an officer portal for managing membership, decisions, evidence, and audits (designed without a ballot-casting path), and a backend platform with API, database, and self-host deployment options. It offers procedure packs tailored to different governance contexts, including clubs and societies, boards and companies, while maintaining that ballots can only be cast from the voter's own device. The software can be self-hosted or used through a hosted lease option.
- Website
- publicvoting.org
- Categories
- Computer software
