But what has become of the Parchamps. I was raised there from kindergarten to 3 rd. We had a good reputation. Between Dupanloup and Landowski. But when I see the comments I tell myself that I was there at the best time ...
An odd notation, the class council (and the director Me Debats), considered our child as an excellent student by giving him the best score for "knowledge, skills, culture" at the end of the 3rd which reported 50% in its patent rating.
But, ubiquitous and improbable situation, Me the director refused the orientation in 2nd General for the following reason: "does not have the level" whereas it had just granted the maximum note of excellence to our child.
So, great distrust of honesty and so-called benevolence because to make sure to be included in the ranking of very good colleges, it is enough for the director to overstate the patent mark like that, even the "null" which by elsewhere are trained by the Parchamp, obtain the Brevet with the mention very well.
College that is more interested in his image than in his pedagogical accompaniment and for listening, we feel hypocrisy "always causes ...". We are sold clearly "the dream" with results to the patent 100% with mentions but we must know how to moderate its results when we know how the director I Debats made to get them. Knows all the strings of the system and is lying and knows not to be caught ... So prefer colleges that are really competent where children learn in kindness and with true values of respect.
Great warning for all parents who want to go to the Appeal Board. Is it normal to find the following inscription on our sealed envelope containing our file: "opened at the request of the family to add a document" when we have never given our agreement. If the head teacher, Madame Debats had the right to open our envelope, as she claimed, then why did you take care to write on it that it was at our request that it had been opened on the pretext that we forgot to add a document? When it is false and in fact, the head of the school took the opportunity to insert a charge letter without our being able to contradict it. This is also the Parchamp educational project ...
Omerta when the serious acts are perfectly identified and nothing is done ... There are heavy penalties for students who lie or cheat but nothing for the director Mrs. D.
To avoid for the good balance of your child and especially for its orientation
Condescending management, professors too little involved, hardly any distance learning during the first lockdown while payments were not suspended. This year, my daughter is at Notre Dame and we see the difference every day!
We had management decisions which were arbitrary, inept, changeable and inconsistent. No notion of listening but complacency for methods very little value and with the contempt of common sense.
Orientation tests organized by an independent center and passed within the Parchamp grounds over 1 day are chargeable and optional. This makes it possible to consolidate choices, to make the link between aptitudes, centers of interest and personality, it is very good except that the director is not of this opinion and takes absolutely no account of it for the orientation of your child, whom she does not meet elsewhere, any more than she meets the parents. So why offer to take tests? My point of view is that as a good politician, knows how to smooth her image and work her Com (you have to do things at Parchamp) but on the other hand, taking our children serenely to success, it is an unknown land
sjparchamp.fr