1. Just look at Joe. 2. It's easy to seem knowledg...

1. Just look at Joe. 2. It's easy to seem knowledgeable to people who don't a lot about a certain subject. 3. Rescues do breed, to repopulate an endangered species for release. But if that's what you're doing you don't let humans pay to handle them. They need to be as wild as possible to succeed upon release. The fact that you pay extra for time with overhandled cubs sheds light on Joe's motives. 4. Speaking of motives, I'd just like to ask everyone to consider what motives would lie behind both good and bad reviews. Just think about it. 5. Most positive reviews focus heavily on defending the park, and on animal interaction, which is a controversial selling point. People who were happy to kiss a camel also don't mention the "hardy-har poop eater" shtick Joe follows with. Many positive reviews also state animals looked "fat." Fat isn't healthy either. 6. That said, overheated animals are irrelevant. Do you know what the weather is like in India? There's plenty of stuff to be concerned about without searching for something to say. 7. Just do your research, aside from reviews. Read about denial of renewal of USDA grants and the traveling tiger show. How they only got the grant, after being denied and having to get up to standards. Research the reasons they hate PETA. Tigers won't go extinct without Joe. Saying that he keeps them alive is not a selling point. There are better alternatives.