the stars should be 4 for the 3D planetarium and t...

the stars should be 4 for the 3D planetarium and the part on the human body, technologically speaking well done, in step with the times. But we come to the stars missing, starting right from the human body department, maybe you the little guy with a beard is prepared, but to tell children who have the flat encephalogram just because they did not know how to answer it seems totally wrong. The same route faced the streets of the Sea where the "professor I know everything" never gave time to the children always to respond, and never used words to make people understand why of a thing, churning out names that to a child import, a lot of beautiful school that serves him, a child serves the way to behave and be able to say two words, but right, rejected as a person absolutely. Restaurant absent even if reported on site as open, leaving participants without food, if not to be found outside. Show in 2d always the planetary boring, cometely distant from the one seen in 3d in the morning. Department of absent insects, apart from 3 types of ants and a scorpion (which does not seem to me an insect, maybe wrong), the ant boy, I must say very nice, the only one who explained in a simple and right way to my daughter and to other children. Structure in general pleasant, organization by a star. Too bad, the potential is there, but change the insiders, or people run away before the end of the lesson.