sou abe

Review of Nikon

It is good for the current product and the thing d...

It is good for the current product and the thing during service acceptance period, but the thing of the service end is useless. We say that it is bureaucratic or you do not get in any way. Maybe it was an odd thing, but in my own way Canon still had more flexibility.

Also questions about the technology later. As it has two kitchens with F2 body, it specializes in repair one machine. I asked for another one. The first thing I noticed at the reception desk about repair completion was the peeling of the paint on the front of the body. I used a solvent to peel off the leather. Even when asked, "No parts" "I'm sorry" single point. This condition ... although I got a good F2 of purpose enough and put it out for the manufacturer. It is passed in the state corrected with the touch pen, and the mirror is stuck when I give it up and receive it and confirm it by saying "Please forgive it with this". ? . I was asked to respond on the spot, but I regretted at the same time looking at the correction of the body that I took and attached. It should have been sent to the repair company from the beginning.

It may be a reliable place for professionals and those using the latest models, but since I am a poor user who only has old products including Digichi, I have not trusted Nikon services since then. You will feel sad even if you inquire.