A

Alessandro Maggioni

3 years ago

5 years of construction engineering behind.

5 years of construction engineering behind.
Average judgment motivated by the presence of both great excellence and strong inefficiencies.

Regardless of the difficulty, the propensity and the personal commitment, the degree of preparation that a course gave me was also a function of the professor I found myself in front of.

On the one hand I was lucky enough to attend courses for people trained as technicians and good as teachers: the cultural baggage acquired by their lessons is proving to be the determining one for my insertion into the world of work.

On the other hand it has been very annoying for me to have spent hours and money to follow the courses of teachers who are incapable as such, regardless of the curriculum they boast.
Teachers sometimes so excited by themselves that they waste time telling about their "adventures" instead of teaching. Or dedicated to motivational speeches to promote an alleged "elite" of the Italian engineer, forgetting that professionalism is not proportional to the degree.
I also attended courses by lazy teachers who presented themselves in the classroom without a program, without lessons ... and they told of how and why without arguing, concluding, without a real logic.
And finally, I took lessons from teachers who took their course together by badly stacking topics already covered in much more detail in other more consolidated courses.

Comments:

No comments