Peter W. Krueger

Review of Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg

How and what should and can a station be rated?

How and what should and can a station be rated?
After the buildings?
The broadcasting center is historically and architecturally successful and interesting, but as an employee you have to be on foot.
The television center looks bombastic and invites you to get lost. A lot of botching on the construction, so after one of the last "century downpours, the cutting rooms in the basement were under water. Huge studios are empty because supposedly in-house productions are too expensive. For that, the productions go away where they are produced according to dumping prices. These price breakers Studios are then also subsidiaries of the ARD.How that is compatible with the broadcasting state treaty .... completely unclear to me.
After the program?
Then that shouldn't be a skyscraper. There is hardly anything worth seeing, like many things in Berlin ..... What is the saying: "Art comes from being able to do it, if it comes from wanting it would be called WUNST". What are the differences between the many radio programs? Only wireless radio, a music program is enough for so-called basic services. Cultural editors bring no classical music, otherwise they are speechless. Where are the radio plays, the essays, the reports on exhibitions, excavations, etc.? A bright spot is the INFO radio, but it keeps repeating.
From an economic point of view?
Well, the broadcaster gives work to a few people, employment to many people and some people to earn a living. It's just a big administration with quite a small broadcasting company.