a

arnold

4 years ago

What an unbelievable BAD institute (because you ca...

What an unbelievable BAD institute (because you can not name a training institute). Many things are promised, such as teachers with work experience, guidance, etc. Everything turns out to be nothing wrong . Most examinations contain questions which have never been dealt with in the books or in class, in case of questions about this there will never be an answer except if payment is made because they are very fond of parting! The portofolio assignments are also rejected with vague feedback for no reason whatsoever. If the only points of criticism are adjusted (because the rest seems to be good, otherwise this would have been underpinned by criticism you would say) it just comes back with the same figure with even more nonsense criticism. Oh yes and then of course we have to pay again ... When repeated calling about this, it will be promised that you will be called back because the study supervisor "works at home" happens to be a yes, then of course you can not be called back.

Conclusion NEVER go in the sea with separegger (or ncoi because that is the same)! Money is better spent on a good trainer where one is not only out to finance the students financially (because once paid and started the study you can not just stop ...)

And so, a study that promises to last for 1 year in a drama of several years of misery and scam has changed.

Google also agree on complaints separator. Also clarifies a lot!

Comments:

No comments