Clyde Smith Review of San Francisco Veterans Affairs...
The VA is terrible and this location is one of man...
The VA is terrible and this location is one of many that don t care how veterans are treated. Tried to reach a nurse to schedule my surgery and it took 3 weeks for me to finally get the surgery scheduled. I would call and leave a secure message and wouldn t get a call back until 7 or 8 days later. Each time I spoke with Tracie Citron in the Neurology department, she had a different lie about why she was unable to contact me in a timely manner. I called the patient advocate and they did the bare minimum, so they weren t much help. I contacted the directors office and left 4 messages for someone to call me back. I wanted to give the director feedback how this employee was not doing her job in a timely manner. I wanted to convey to the director the problems I was having so the veterans after me might not have to face what I went through to schedule my surgery. I was given the contact info of one person and one person only that you can contact to schedule your surgery. I would call and secure message and receive a call back 7-8 days later each time. If she is doing it to me, then I bet other veterans are facing the same issue. Back to the director, I tried to contact 4 times via voicemails and no return calls. I called back a 5th time and spoke with a young lady that took down my info and promised me someone would call me back. Well, it s a week later and NO ONE has called me back. I called again today (6th attempt) and spoke to a very rude man and was told I didn t follow the proper channels so I couldn t speak with the director. I explained over and over to the man that I did contact the patient advocate and nothing was changed so that s why I wanted to speak with the director. Apparently, they aren t interested in hearing about how their veterans are treated. Filling a VA inspector general complaint. This type of treatment goes against the VA s promise and mission statement of how they intend to treat veterans.
Comments: