ANTISEMITE ??? This is the question that I ended u...

ANTISEMITE ??? This is the question that I ended up asking myself when I saw an administrative harassment in good standing which was the victim of an elderly person around me in very poor health. Jewish, his little solidarity retreat has been suspended for more than 3 months.
It front of:
- Administrative documents sent by registered mail with acknowledgment of receipt signed by Carsat and their disappearances ...
-Continuous requests for administrative elements or for private life, sometimes very absurd for several months.
-Requests for attestations on the honor of the entourage and health personnel supporting the current file given then deemed unnecessary and requested again for other periods.
-Many trips to Carsat requested from a person with reduced mobility
- "Without embarrassment" and "zeal without limit" of the file manager.

The limits of "normal" are exceeded in the context of simple litigation. A negative or positive response following one or two requests for supporting documents seems to me to be the normality in all the administrations or organizations of public service missions as well as the right to error (Macron law)

How can we go after an elderly person by endangering the little health he has left and leave a "doubt of anti-Semitism" to settle?