My experience with Paul Richard Tapsell barrister ...

My experience with Paul Richard Tapsell barrister of Beckets Chambers Canterbury Innovation Centre University Road Canterbury and solicitor Simon Levack of Ratcliffes Solicitors 22 Park Road Sittingbourne

I found them to be devious and manipulating, they failed to do their job or report in 2015 the Local Planning Authority for their unlawful acts

They failed to challenge the Planning Inspector Tim Belcher at the Public Inquiry regarding his unlawful acts

Ratcliffes solicitors were instructed to get a barrister of Queens Counsel level to defend. Simon Levack said he knew of a barrister of 20 years standing and an expert in planning law ( Mr Paul Tapsell a friend of his from childhood).

I have found out that Paul Tapsell is a jobbing barrister with no expertise in any field.



Simon Levack and Paul Tapsell were party to deceiving her ladyship Whipple at the application for the appeal 13 9 18

Likewise Giles Atkinson for The Local Planning Authority of 6 Pump Court Temple London EC4 Y7AR was fully aware when he presented the papers before Her Honour they contained forged documents etc..

Because of Paul Tapsell s conduct at the Inquiry I made enquiries and found he had been working for Canterbury City Council in planning for approximately 20 years at the same time running my case.

When I told Simon Levack what I had found out he said he had told me this before he took the case on,
this never happend, I found out by the Freedom Of Information from Canterbury City Council. I would never have had Paul Tapsell work for me had I been told

I found them both to be failures, I rate them the lowest end of their profession, and should be struck off for bringing