J

Mediocre experience, waited over an hour in the lo...

Mediocre experience, waited over an hour in the lobby at the Urgent Care intake, left once we were told it would be another 20 minutes to be seen. Remember when Urgent Care meant a hard max of 45-minutes in-and-out, start-to-finish deal? Well they don't, because this group of highly trained professionals have never really been able to quite figure out that they need more lay-staff and on-call doctors. It's almost as if they know that not being to see patients efficiently is bad and one of the biggest problems in corporate healthcare (because corporations are far too cheap to adequately staff), but then they openly choose to not work any harder or any smarter to resolve the darkly hilarious prospect of patients dying while waiting over an hour for emergency or urgent care. Guys- if you can't seat patients in front of doctors in under 20 minutes, you are plain, flat-out not capable of providing urgent care by it's very literal name. If you can't do emergency rooms in 10, your complacency with bureaucracy and the status quo has exceeded the critical level where reason meets expectations. This makes your emergency room a potentially DANGEROUS decision to make, from a standpoint of patient well-being. We sent men to the moon 60 years ago in a tin foil rocket powered by a mechanical calculator. We invented the internet 30 years ago. Even you guys have multiple cyber-knives, and a large array of other extremely advanced pieces of groundbreaking technology. You should NOT be pleased with yourselves that it takes over an hour for a doctor, under any circumstance, let alone in an urgent care setting. Get good- or quit, to put it simply.

Comments:

No comments